2,772
Life MemberLife Member
2,772

PostJan 21, 2009#226

Has everyone seen the window display of the proposed trolley line on the Loop? Pretty cool stuff.

214
Junior MemberJunior Member
214

PostJan 21, 2009#227

Has everyone seen the window display of the proposed trolley line on the Loop? Pretty cool stuff.


Yes, I noticed it a few weeks ago - I'm not sure how much longer it will be around as they'll probably redecorate the display window for St. Valentine's Day, if not before (though the current display seems to have survived Elvis' birthday :) ).

1,877
Never Logs OffNever Logs Off
1,877

PostJan 21, 2009#228

JuiceInDogtown wrote:Has everyone seen the window display of the proposed trolley line on the Loop? Pretty cool stuff.


From Flickr:







-RBB

3,544
Life MemberLife Member
3,544

PostFeb 18, 2009#229

Doesn't look like the trolley will get funding since it isn't "ready-to-go".

Big step forward, but this project is still probably years away. I can see the bloggers now! "They spent money on a damn trolley for the ghetto!".



http://cmt-stl.org/news/story_18.html

11K
Life MemberLife Member
11K

PostFeb 18, 2009#230

^ The ridiculous thing is that there were basically 0 "shovel ready" projects because who in the H3LL would move a project all the way to "shovel ready" with ZERO prospects of getting it done. This has been mentioned in a number of articles and I believe the NOW PBS piece posted elsewhere. For more than a decade there has been little money and little hope of developing comprehensive mass transit for places like St. Louis. Now that there MAY be money for some projects many people seem to discount such opportunities because they're not ready to go - well what the H3LL did you expect!?!?!!?

274
Full MemberFull Member
274

PostFeb 19, 2009#231

^ yeah, I'm not sure in a period of 4 weeks most communities were going to be able to get hundreds of billions of dollars worth of projects from studies to shovels, it seemed a bit ridiculous

3,544
Life MemberLife Member
3,544

PostMar 22, 2009#232





New website for the Delmar Trolley Loop! Feasibility Study/Engineering should be complete by December 2009.



Here is the Link: http://www.looptrolley.org/index.html



Route Map




4,553
Life MemberLife Member
4,553

PostMar 23, 2009#233

Can this be merged with the other Loop Trolley topic?



Two ideas for lending this (2.2 mile) project a little bit more utility:



1.) Continue east on Lindell from DeBaliviere to Grand, and then south to the Grand Metro Station. (5.5 miles total)

-Connecting The Loop, Forest Park, CWE, Midtown, and SLU would transform this project from novelty ride to usefulness transit option.

-This would increase the utility and appeal of the Grand Station.

-Running from DeBaliviere to Kingshighway along Lindell would showcase some of St. Louis' finest houses and our finest park, just like the St. Charles Streetcar in New Orleans.



2.) Go all the way east on Lindell and then Olive to the arch grounds. Cutting straight through DT and over I-70. (7.75 miles)

-This alignment would be about the length of the St. Charles Line which is 8 miles.





Edit: If anything happens with this project Skinker-DeBaliviere will be the most obscenely well served transit neighborhood outside of a DT in the whole of the midwest.

11K
Life MemberLife Member
11K

PostMar 23, 2009#234

I'll admit that no one asked, but here's my take on the Delmar Trolley . . . Kill it!



http://stlurbanworkshop.blogspot.com/20 ... etcar.html

PostMar 23, 2009#235

Bumped - to continue Delmar Trolley discussion here.



My take: Kill it.



http://stlurbanworkshop.blogspot.com/20 ... etcar.html

8,911
Life MemberLife Member
8,911

PostMar 23, 2009#236

^ you make a very stron arguement there grover

432
Full MemberFull Member
432

PostMar 23, 2009#237

Grover wrote:Bumped - to continue Delmar Trolley discussion here.



My take: Kill it.



http://stlurbanworkshop.blogspot.com/20 ... etcar.html


Yay, someone else who sees the vacant Wabash station fronting Delmar and how disappointing it looks. I understand that it was probably not within the budget in 1993 to do a historic renovation of the building into a Metrolink station, but it's still sad to see that building sit there unused for any purpose.



Geo St Louis indicates Joe Edwards bought the Wabash station in 2002, and at least as of 4 years ago he envisioned a restaurant conversion for the place.

11K
Life MemberLife Member
11K

PostMar 24, 2009#238

Some nice pub for the Saint Louis Urban Workshop:



http://stlurbanworkshop.blogspot.com/20 ... louis.html




2,426
Life MemberLife Member
2,426

PostMar 24, 2009#239

Your points against the streetcar are well taken. However, at this point, the Delmar streetcar is the only hope of reintroducing streetcar service to the city at this point. Because Joe Edwards is such a respected and proven urban pioneer, this line would likely serve as the prototype for other neighborhoods down the road. For this reason, I support the project.

10K
AdministratorAdministrator
10K

PostMar 24, 2009#240

STLgasm wrote:Your points against the streetcar are well taken. However, at this point, the Delmar streetcar is the only hope of reintroducing streetcar service to the city at this point. Because Joe Edwards is such a respected and proven urban pioneer, this line would likely serve as the prototype for other neighborhoods down the road. For this reason, I support the project.


Yeah, I agree. Delmar would not necessarily be my first choice, if I could have a streetcar line anywhere in STL (I'd probably choose Grand), but we need Edwards to get it started, which means it will be on Delmar. I'd love to see it go further east, to Euclid or beyond. Having the line go past DeBaliviere could potentially lead to new development on Delmar between Union and Kingshighway.

1,610
Totally AddictedTotally Addicted
1,610

PostMar 24, 2009#241

St. Louis shouldn't re-introduce streetcar service via vintage vehicles, as much as it should introduce modern streetcars.



It's also the difference between a Tourist Trolley and Real Transportation.

2,005
Life MemberLife Member
2,005

PostMar 24, 2009#242

Grover wrote:Bumped - to continue Delmar Trolley discussion here.



My take: Kill it.



http://stlurbanworkshop.blogspot.com/20 ... etcar.html


The pricetag alone is enough to kill it. Estimated cost for construction a few years ago was around $30 million, I bet that's jumped to around $40 million by now.

907
Super MemberSuper Member
907

PostMar 24, 2009#243

Why cant we just use what Denver does for its 16th street downtown.

THey have a dedicate lane that is for a dedicated 16th bus which the sole purpose is to go up and down the street and pick up people.. (for free)



Cheaper, and gets the same thing done!



You can even add overhead electricity for the bus and make it into Boston’s transit which is half rail half hybrid buses that act as rail, then go on streets once out from the tunnel. (I am simplifying this, but it was awesome!)

549
Senior MemberSenior Member
549

PostMar 24, 2009#244

zink wrote:Why cant we just use what Denver does for its 16th street downtown.

THey have a dedicate lane that is for a dedicated 16th bus which the sole purpose is to go up and down the street and pick up people.. (for free)



Cheaper, and gets the same thing done!


My girlfriend's dad, (a now retired urban planner who spent most of his professional career working for the city), proposed such a solution to Joe Edwards recently. He suggested that such a bus could go into effect immediately and bridge the gap until the trolley proper gets built; a sort of test run. Unfortunately, Edwards was not open to the idea...at all.

205
Junior MemberJunior Member
205

PostMar 24, 2009#245

Correct me if I'm wrong, but don't buses serve the same number of people, are more versatile as far as routes, and a whole lot cheaper to maintain, fix, replace?



As much as I would love to ride a streetcar through the streets of St. Louis (and I would), at this point the streetcar doesn't appear to me to be at all necessary to our current transit needs.



Also, I'd like to point out Zink's post in the other delmar trolley thread, which I totally agree with. This seems to me like the proper route for future rapid street transit. http://www.urbanstl.com/viewtopic.php?p=149723#149723

11K
Life MemberLife Member
11K

PostMar 24, 2009#246

I don't blame him, but obviously the Loop Trolley is a business endeavor by Mr. Edwards and not a transportation solution. I think that he fails to see that a modern streetcar line (like all those pictured on the Loop Trolley website) connected to the CWE and hopefully downtonw would have an exponentially greater positive impact on the Loop (and the rest of the city of course!).



I'm glad that the city didn't back the new baseball stadium to the tune of $$$ millions, but a streetcar along these lines would seems worthy of such an outlay - why not?

2,929
Life MemberLife Member
2,929

PostMar 24, 2009#247

Recognize that there are two advocates of these streetcars:

1. Transportation infrastructure & public transportation enthousiasts, and

2. Loop business interests utilizing a streetcar strictly as a marketing device.



Whether a streetcar/trolley goes along the Loop or not, it is extremely doubtful that the group would advocate for its advancement elsewhere. I can see that, should a Loop streetcar line be established, the business interests who advocated for the line's creation would campaign against a similar streetcar line being established for other competing districts. It could actually be detrimental to the brand valuation of a Loop streetcar line if another one was established for South Grand to Tower Grove Park, or along Manchester Road from Maplewood to FPSE.



The interests of transportation infrastructure & public transportation enthousiasts are not of prominence to a Loop streetcar. For all those who are of the former, recognize this perspective in how you advocate to your advantage, otherwise you may be shunned at the table.

11K
Life MemberLife Member
11K

PostMar 24, 2009#248

^ Very well stated GC.

44
New MemberNew Member
44

PostMar 24, 2009#249

Joe Edwards has said many times publicly that he views the Loop Trolley project as a prototype for streetcars being restored in a number of locations in the city. There is a group working on a downtown streetcar right now. The study will look at a variety of vehicle alternatives for the line, including replicas of vintage equipment. The 2000 study also showed that a rubber tire alternative would not attract the riders that an authentic streetcar would.



Finally, the 16th street bus in Denver runs in a dedicated right-of-way. Streetcar service along Delmar, most likely will be in mixed traffic.



The consultants have been instructed to find ways to keep the costs of the project down. We will see what they come up with.



Hopefully, the region will come up with a funding solution for Metro. Not doing so in my mind jeopardizes any transit improvements.

10K
AdministratorAdministrator
10K

PostMar 24, 2009#250

I would still love to see the line extended east to at least Euclid. To me, that's its best chance for truly spurring additional development and bringing patrons to businesses along the Delmar strip.

Read more posts (2096 remaining)