Tapatalk

Loop Lofts (Bardenheier Winery) - 1019 N Skinker Pkwy

Loop Lofts (Bardenheier Winery) - 1019 N Skinker Pkwy

1,649
Super ModeratorSuper Moderator
1,649

PostMay 13, 2005#1

<A HREF="http://www.stltoday.com/stltoday/news/s ... 54728E">No tax break, no project, Wellston is told</A>

By STERLING LEVY

Special to the Post-Dispatch

05/12/2005



Project would create 100 lofts and more



Plans to redevelop the former Bardenheier Winery on the St. Louis-Wellston border into more than 100 lofts plus a restaurant and commercial space could be thwarted if Wellston will not grant a temporary property tax abatement, says the head of Restoration St. Louis Inc.



More than 95 percent of the site in the 1000 block of Skinker Parkway is in St. Louis' 25th Ward. The property was a well-known streetcar barn and bus repair facility for decades, and a winery through the 1990s.



<A HREF="http://www.stltoday.com/stltoday/news/s ... FE0054728E">>>> read more</A>

2,005
Life MemberLife Member
2,005

PostMay 13, 2005#2

This is almost sick. A town with 5% of a development can stop it by not granting a tax abatement that will almost certainly help it in the long run. Wellston is in very bad shape, but they come across as being too proud to accept help or they can't see far enough in the future. Can the developer build a parking lot on the Wellston side?

1,610
Totally AddictedTotally Addicted
1,610

PostMay 13, 2005#3

95% of this property is in the City of St. Louis, only 5% in Wellston. For property taxes in Wellston, Wellston sets the rates and decides on its share of abatement, but the County collects the taxes first before giving Wellston its municipal share of the tax rate.



Odd rules apply when living on jurisdictional boundaries. Maplewood likely has the most split residential properties with the City. And when it comes to taxes and services, the two have memos of understanding.



For example, I believe the location of the master or majority of bedrooms determines which jurisdiction collects property taxes. Perhaps, the Gills could be creative with their floorplans if Wellston is not willing to cooperate.

1,026
Expert MemberExpert Member
1,026

PostMay 13, 2005#4

Yeah I must say I fail to see that guy's logic. Wellston is starved for development. They shoudl be jumping for joy that anyone would want to invest money in their area. .. How does he figure that this deal is to Wellston's disadvantage. Its not as if they have developers lining up to develope that property; So I ask him: which would you prefer - development that pays taxes in ten years or no development at all.



Why can't politicians realize that a tax abatment is an INVESTMENT cost. A city waies a certain portion of future revenues (revenues that would NOT be there if not for the tax abatement) for the development of a larger, wealthier tax base in their area.



It's wise to invest in your tax base.

10K
AdministratorAdministrator
10K

PostMay 13, 2005#5

With "leadership" like that in place in Wellston, it's no wonder that city is in the shape it's in right now.

4,489
Super ModeratorSuper Moderator
4,489

PostMay 13, 2005#6

^St. Louis City is certainly ascending, but let's not forget that it hasn't always been that way. The city was in bad shape, had poor "leadership" for decades, lacked resources, and wasn't too open to ideas from outsiders especially one's that would seemingly place a burden on city coffers.



The city (St. Louis) changed some things and took some risks which have worked out for the best. Like St. Louis, the same thing could happen in Wellston with regards to this project, and others, if council people become open and are provided with appropriate consultation.



I'm all for the development, and I think Wellston should consider the possibilities, but I understand their reservations as well.

10K
AdministratorAdministrator
10K

PostMay 14, 2005#7

And I'm certainly not one to say that Wellston should be happy to get any kind of development - people have been saying that about the city for years. However, this is a great project by a reputable developer - seems like a no-brainer to me.

4,489
Super ModeratorSuper Moderator
4,489

PostMay 19, 2005#8

^I hear you. In general, I agree with you too. I am simply trying to be objective with regards to Wellston.



Point is?Wellston, despite its woes, is not the only municipality in the region that has to make important decisions for its community. What's a no-brainer to you and I is not always so obvious to a municipality. Municipalities are faced with decisions regularly about how to best meet the needs of their community.



Hopefully, there can be an agreement or compromise reached with regards to this proposal for St. Louis/Wellston.

1,768
Never Logs OffNever Logs Off
1,768

PostFeb 14, 2006#9

Any one know where these are?



1019 N. Skiker...how far up the Skink is that? I'm looking at one in a couple of days, but am a little concerned about where it may be (because I don't know). Was Just hoping it was within a block or two of Delmar.



These are Bran new and very large for a great price, which is why I'm looking here. Either her or DT...or theCWE...or Debaliviere...or Lafayette Square...Or St. Louis Hills...no, no Link...

2,426
Life MemberLife Member
2,426

PostFeb 14, 2006#10

It's in WELLSTON!!!!! I've driven by it and it's going to be spectacular. The Gills are a godsend.

3,785
Life MemberLife Member
3,785

PostFeb 14, 2006#11

Like Wellston in the county?

466
Full MemberFull Member
466

PostFeb 14, 2006#12

freakin' gills. they got to welston before me. that was my plan all along, wind powered lofts in the factories. someone else was the beauty in that area as well. good for them.

2,430
Life MemberLife Member
2,430

PostFeb 14, 2006#13

Is this that abandoned factory or wine making site I have heard about? Either way, maybe this will spur Wash U's talked about graduate school village north of delmar.

1,026
Expert MemberExpert Member
1,026

PostFeb 14, 2006#14

I love this development because its WAY up Delmar. Pretty risky if you ask me. They're bieng true pioneers here ...

2,331
Super ModeratorSuper Moderator
2,331

PostFeb 14, 2006#15

Intriquing. Does anyone know how this location relates to Metrolink. Is it near a station?

1,768
Never Logs OffNever Logs Off
1,768

PostFeb 14, 2006#16

So this is the Brandenberg Winery thingy? Not exactly the short hike to the Link, shops and restaurants I'm looking for (going carless)...



Oh well, maybe there is something else...

2,426
Life MemberLife Member
2,426

PostFeb 14, 2006#17

It's not far from the Metro at all. You can get a good view of the building if you're on the train.



I've discussed the project with someone at Restoration St. Louis and he said this is going to be an amazing project. I really think this is first step towards breaking the "north of Delmar" stigma.

1,768
Never Logs OffNever Logs Off
1,768

PostFeb 14, 2006#18

Is it in the city limits or not?

1,610
Totally AddictedTotally Addicted
1,610

PostFeb 14, 2006#19

The site address is 6124 Horton Place, which is in the City.

502
Senior MemberSenior Member
502

PostFeb 14, 2006#20


1,391
Veteran MemberVeteran Member
1,391

PostFeb 14, 2006#21

Is that near the old bus station just off of Union?



http://www.apartments-stlouis.com/loopl ... lofts.html



Check out the design for these lofts. VERY creative. Good stuff and will give that area a nice jolt.

1,054
Expert MemberExpert Member
1,054

PostFeb 15, 2006#22

It is six blocks from the Loop and three from the future WashU campus, and a person would have to pass by the industrial section of U. City which could easily become more residential with eastern U. City Olive Boulevard reverberating back to a main commercial street again. I am all for redeveloping east Olive back into a residential/commercial district.

1,610
Totally AddictedTotally Addicted
1,610

PostFeb 15, 2006#23

The 2.5-acre site straddles the City limits. From the Assessor's parcel map (6124 Horton), it appears that the building is almost fully within the City of St. Louis, though the western edge of the property is within Wellston, along the east side of the MetroLink tracks.

10K
AdministratorAdministrator
10K

PostFeb 15, 2006#24

Weren't they having trouble getting TIF funds from Wellston? I guess they've worked it out.

1,610
Totally AddictedTotally Addicted
1,610

PostFeb 15, 2006#25

Usually the complaint with TIF is that it can rob schools of increased property taxes-- the tax base for schools. However, when a property straddles two school districts, I think a rule reads that the location of the child's bedroom determines the school district. In the case of the Loop Lofts, however, virtually all of the building is within the City of St. Louis and St. Louis Public School District. Only the western half of a future gated parking lot (no bedrooms) is within Wellston.



Given where the property falls, I think it's nice of our City to share the taxes with our more distressed neighbor in the County. However, when it comes to TIF, Wellston Schools wouldn't even be able to have any of the future kids living in the development eligible for enrollment in their schools. Of course, since a loft project appealing to WashU students, it is unlikely that there would even be that many children living in the development anyway.



Since the 1876 limits were drawn before development reached them, there are many properties split between our City and others, creating confusion in tax collection and delivery of services. In another example, the Shrewsbury Shop'n'Save on Chippewa splits its sales taxes 50-50 between the two cities, yet the other stores within the strip center on the same parcel split fairly evenly with Shrewsbury don't share their sales taxes with the City. I guess each site straddling the limits, whether 50-50 or 90-10, require negotiation between two cities.

Read more posts (28 remaining)