2,426
Life MemberLife Member
2,426

PostNov 20, 2008#541

I think the entire design blows. It's boring, overdone and cheesy. Why is St. Louis so afraid to build anything sleek and modern? In terms of contemporary architecture, St. Louis has to be among the dullest cities in the country. How did the Arch ever get built here?

101
Junior MemberJunior Member
101

PostNov 20, 2008#542

^ I agree it lacks modern creativity, but at least something is being built. We shouldn't be too suprised about the scale back its been happening all over the city :x .

710
Senior MemberSenior Member
710

PostNov 30, 2008#543

without the clock tower and the top floor-it becomes boring at best and i'll take that over the rendering...

12K
Life MemberLife Member
12K

PostDec 01, 2008#544

An article in the Post today said the final design should be ready by the end of the year.



http://www.stltoday.com/stltoday/busine ... enDocument

2,426
Life MemberLife Member
2,426

PostFeb 04, 2009#545

Every time I pass by this hole, it infuriates me. The Mills owe us an update.

1,391
Veteran MemberVeteran Member
1,391

PostFeb 06, 2009#546

Hate to say it, but "I told you so."

5,433
Super ModeratorSuper Moderator
5,433

PostFeb 06, 2009#547

STLgasm wrote:Every time I pass by this hole, it infuriates me. The Mills owe us an update.


I'll tell you what else infuriates me- I hate how the city wastes no time demolishing buildings for plans that are never realized. It's apparently a longstanding practice, because long before the Doctors' Building was razed, the same thing happened with the old Sears on South Grand and the old Famous-Barr at Kingshighway and Chippewa. And while the building at Washington Avenue and 14th Street was no huge loss overall, there was really no point in bringing it down since Skyhouse isn't going forward either.



Meanwhile, there are countless gas stations, car dealers, and fast food fry pits that remain standing years after they were abandoned. I'd love to be able to demolish some of those buildings and make the sites more attractive for appropriate infill, but for some reason most of them are left standing for years while other (usually historic) buildings are demolished first with questions asked later (unless you're SLU, in which case no questions are asked at all). I just don't get it.



I'd like to believe this corner is too valuable and important to sit vacant for too long. However, I thought the same about the old Southtown Famous-Barr, and it sat vacant for nearly a decade until we got a lame and half-occupied strip mall in its place, so who knows. I'll keep my fingers crossed, though, because Mills could have an easier time getting financing together for apartments than condos in this environment. Like so many other things in this economy I guess we'll have to wait and see.

11K
Life MemberLife Member
11K

PostFeb 09, 2009#548

I've been told by a couple different people that financing is holding up this project. IMO - if and when the credit markets calm down a project like this will get built quickly. Of course there are other avenues to explore for funding as well.

100
Junior MemberJunior Member
100

PostFeb 15, 2009#549

Grover wrote:I've been told by a couple different people that financing is holding up this project. IMO - if and when the credit markets calm down a project like this will get built quickly. Of course there are other avenues to explore for funding as well.




Even if financing could be arranged, would this project still be given the green light in view of the units unsold at the Chase, 4545, and to a lesser extent the Park East Lofts?

I suppose, as was mentioned above, it will be easier to get credit to build rental property than condominiums.

6,662
AdministratorAdministrator
6,662

PostFeb 15, 2009#550

For starters, it is rental. That alone makes it a different animal than a condo building. Second, if financing can be arranged, the only thing that could stop a project is some sort of architectural review, of which this project does not have to go through. So, if they can figure out how to do the financing, this one will go up.



In the mean time, the least they could do is pump the water out of the hole when it rains.

100
Junior MemberJunior Member
100

PostFeb 15, 2009#551

MattnSTL wrote:For starters, it is rental. That alone makes it a different animal than a condo building. Second, if financing can be arranged, the only thing that could stop a project is some sort of architectural review, of which this project does not have to go through. So, if they can figure out how to do the financing, this one will go up.



In the mean time, the least they could do is pump the water out of the hole when it rains.


Sorry, I didn't realize it had changed from condo/rental mix to all rentals (didn't read the STLtoday.com article until just now).



Weren't we discussing the mosquitos breeding in that water earlier? At least it's too cold for mosquitos now. Perhaps Mills considers that pit a community skate park when it freezes.

6,662
AdministratorAdministrator
6,662

PostFeb 15, 2009#552

We did discuss the water, but it continues to be a problem. As of about 3:00 pm today, there is standing water from the rain earlier in the week.

359
Full MemberFull Member
359

PostMay 08, 2009#553

I'd really like to see this project become a reality. With the Park East Lofts and Tower right there and all of the other stuff it would be very successful.

22
New MemberNew Member
22

PostMay 08, 2009#554

that hole in the ground has been there a long time

139
Junior MemberJunior Member
139

PostMay 08, 2009#555

Although the CWE is arguably the most resilient and sought after neighborhood in St. Louis City I do worry about it becoming saturated with rental property. First there was a slight over confidence in the condominium market that may have turned into a overestimation of the rental market in the area. There are plenty of institutions (i.e. Wash U, SLU, BJC, etc.) that support this market, but this project may be waiting to see how 3949 Lindell leases with their somewhat pricey rentals.

2,929
Life MemberLife Member
2,929

PostMay 09, 2009#556

ikazy1 wrote:Although the CWE is arguably the most resilient and sought after neighborhood in St. Louis City I do worry about it becoming saturated with rental property.
I'm more worried right now for the ground in the Citywalk hole becoming supersaturated with rainwater from sitting open for so long.



For a project going from a 30+ story condo tower to being a hole, unable to site a smaller project's construction, in such a short amount of time, speaks volumes to the dangers in the commerical real estate market. Let's hope the economy bounces back in the second half of 09.

10K
AdministratorAdministrator
10K

PostMay 10, 2009#557

Just watch, the finished product will probably be a high-rise building for doctors' offices.

139
Junior MemberJunior Member
139

PostMay 11, 2009#558

DeBaliviere wrote: Just watch, the finished product will probably be a high-rise building for doctors' offices.


Actually that wouldn't be a bad idea as long as there is street level retail that the neighborhood could enjoy. Medical facilities are much less vulnerable to economic downturns.

1,610
Totally AddictedTotally Addicted
1,610

PostMay 11, 2009#559

ikazy1 wrote:
DeBaliviere wrote: Just watch, the finished product will probably be a high-rise building for doctors' offices.


Actually that wouldn't be a bad idea as long as there is street level retail that the neighborhood could enjoy. Medical facilities are much less vulnerable to economic downturns.


I think he was drawing on the irony of the fact that they tore down a high-rise building for doctors' offices

11K
Life MemberLife Member
11K

PostMay 11, 2009#560

ricke002 wrote:
ikazy1 wrote:
DeBaliviere wrote: Just watch, the finished product will probably be a high-rise building for doctors' offices.


Actually that wouldn't be a bad idea as long as there is street level retail that the neighborhood could enjoy. Medical facilities are much less vulnerable to economic downturns.


I think he was drawing on the irony of the fact that they tore down a high-rise building for doctors' offices


Or that they tore down a high-rise doctor's building with street level retail for what may become a high-rise doctor's office. I'm pretty sure that this project will proceed in the not-to-distant future.

2,426
Life MemberLife Member
2,426

PostMay 13, 2009#561

According to the West End Word, this project is scheduled to break ground in late August or September.



We'll see if that actually happens...

12K
Life MemberLife Member
12K

PostMay 14, 2009#562

Slightly OT: The Word's project update appeared in a new monthly column called "Property Assessment", which will cover local real estate news. I'll be looking forward to it every month.

359
Full MemberFull Member
359

PostJun 12, 2009#563

STLgasm wrote:According to the West End Word, this project is scheduled to break ground in late August or September.



We'll see if that actually happens...


I hope so, but I wouldn't bet on it.

21
New MemberNew Member
21

PostAug 13, 2009#564

I'm not sure what it means but there was some significant drilling done in multiple locations on the site this week. They used long, skinny drill bits. Maybe some soil samples? Regardless, it costs money and I doubt they want this site vacant much longer. They moved out all the paying tenants and demolished an income producing property, my thinking is they need to get a replacement up as soon as possible.



Sean

11K
Life MemberLife Member
11K

PostAug 13, 2009#565

^ Of course, but they've been waiting for financing for some time. When a loan on reasonable terms can be found they will build. I haven't heard anything for some time, but maybe they now have a loan? And drilling does cost $, but they've likely spent a few $10Ks on drawings, planning, demo (obviously), so they will build. It's a just a matter of time.

Read more posts (432 remaining)