Tapatalk

Switzer Licorice Building - 612 North First Street

Switzer Licorice Building - 612 North First Street

1,282
AdministratorAdministrator
1,282

PostJun 21, 2005#1

Developer seeks a sweeter view

By Charlene Prost

Of the Post-Dispatch

06/20/2005



The perpetually stalled development of the old Switzer Licorice Building in Laclede's Landing is on again, with some reservations



A group led by developer Pete Rothschild is ready to move forward with renovating the long-vacant Switzer Candy Co. building on Laclede's Landing with condominiums and retail.



There's one glitch: a proposed parking garage.



Columbia Sussex Corp. wants to build the six-story garage as part of its new plan to put a casino between the Eads and Martin Luther King bridges on the Landing. But the garage would rise just east of the five-story, 131-year-old Switzer building, blocking river views.



"It would kill our project," Rothschild said. "We certainly couldn't sell condos with views of a parking garage rather than the river."



The city and others are trying to find a way for the Switzer and casino projects to coexist.



Rothschild would spend about $12 million to build 28 condos above street-level retail and indoor parking for condo owners.



He said he would price most condos, with about 1,350 square feet, at about $300,000; two-level penthouses would go for about $600,000. His financing includes a loan from St. Johns Bank & Trust Co., city tax increment financing and state and federal historic tax credits.



Rodney Crim, executive director of the St. Louis Development Corp., said the city stepped in last week when the St. Louis Port Authority commission authorized him to negotiate a revised mooring agreement with Columbia Sussex. The company wants to buy the President Casino on the Admiral and would need a revised mooring lease to replace it with a new casino at the site east of the Switzer building.



As part of the lease negotiations with Columbia Sussex, Crim said his charge from the port commission is to work out a solution that allows both the Switzer and casino projects to go forward.



John Clark, president of Laclede's Landing Redevelopment Corp., said he and others also have been discussing solutions with Rothschild's group and Columbia Sussex.



One possibility, Clark said, would be to reduce the height of the garage and have Columbia Sussex rent office space in the lower levels of the Switzer building, where views would be blocked. Another would be a different garage site, perhaps on vacant land north of the Switzer site.



"We'll do whatever it takes to make (the Switzer project) happen," Clark said. "There are ideas on the table, and where there's a will, there's a way."



Gerard Carmody, a St. Louis attorney who represents Columbia Sussex, said the company also wants to see the matter resolved amicably. "We are exploring different ideas," he said.



Carmody said the company prefers parking across the street from the casino but would consider alternatives.



"We are going to work with the redevelopers of the building and the Laclede's Landing Redevelopment Corp., and will do everything within our power to make everybody happy," he said.



The new garage would be just north of the 1,250-slot Arch parking garage and next to a 300-car garage Columbia Sussex has an option to buy. Together, the two garages would provide Columbia Sussex with 600 to 650 spaces across Leonor K. Sullivan Boulevard from the new casino.



Columbia Sussex proposed the new casino after the city gave redevelopment rights to a parking lot used by President patrons to Pinnacle Entertainment Inc. for its rival, $250 million casino development.



The Switzer building, a candy factory for more than 60 years, has been vacant since 1978. Renovations will take some doing.



"There is no roof and no floors," Rothschild said. "You can stand on the first floor and look into the basement, and then look up and see the sky - a whole lot of sky."



"So you just have to rebuild sections of the walls, do tuckpointing, put on a roof and structurally support the building ... exactly the kind of thing I love to do."



Reporter Charlene Prost

E-mail: cprost@post-dispatch.com

Phone: 314-340-8140

2,331
Super ModeratorSuper Moderator
2,331

PostJun 21, 2005#2

I would rather have the Switzer building brought to life than a casino. I hope they don't spoil the views with a garage. Why should parking garages get prime waterfront lots? If a garage is built, that means the view from the Switzer is ruined, but it also means that the view from the river to Laclede's Landing is ruined. Can you imagine Baltimore Harbor lined up with garages? It doesn't make sense, am I missing something here?

144
Junior MemberJunior Member
144

PostJun 21, 2005#3

There is not much to miss. As usual in this city, it's extreme short-sightedness. What I think is interesting is how the article describes how much parking is already available on the landing. 1,250 spot garage for the arch grounds and landing to the south. I believe it said a 300 spot garage to the north. It's ridiculous.

1,400
Veteran MemberVeteran Member
1,400

PostJun 21, 2005#4

I've said it before: the single largest obstacle in the way of the development of St Louis is the perception that EVERY BUILDING NEEDS ITS OWN F*#@ING GARAGE.

2,426
Life MemberLife Member
2,426

PostJun 22, 2005#5

Anyone know how old the Switzer building is?



The parking garage mentality is making us a second-rate city with every backwards proposal I hear.

1,649
Super ModeratorSuper Moderator
1,649

PostJun 22, 2005#6

STLgasm wrote:Anyone know how old the Switzer building is?


According to the Laclede's Landing (http://www.lacledeslanding.org), the Switzer Building dates back to 1874.

2,426
Life MemberLife Member
2,426

PostJun 22, 2005#7

1874? That's it? That's not very old, considering it sits in the oldest preserved district in the city. I'm very surprised. I was thinking 1850

1,649
Super ModeratorSuper Moderator
1,649

PostJun 22, 2005#8

STLgasm wrote:1874? That's it? That's not very old, considering it sits in the oldest preserved district in the city. I'm very surprised. I was thinking 1850


Yes. That is what the Laclede's Landing had stated. Here is the link. They have other buildings listed as well... there are a few buildings that date from 1844-1855.



http://www.lacledeslanding.org/Tour/walking_pics.html

1,054
Expert MemberExpert Member
1,054

PostJun 23, 2005#9

This thread has transformed. LOL



The Landmarks book that came out in 2002 says that the area south of the arch was filled with cast iron buildings built from the 1840s and on, and were as architecturally significant as the cast iron buildings in New York City. The buildings were destroyed for the Arch and park, and the buildings' details were supposed to be displayed in an architecture museum that never materialized.



So what ever happened to the remains of buildings besides being sold off?



Laclede's Landing is at least lucky to have survived since the Eads Bridge blocked it off from demolition from the Jeff. Memorial Park.

1,649
Super ModeratorSuper Moderator
1,649

PostNov 25, 2005#10

It looks like this project is still moving forward... here is a small mention in this weeks RFT in an article titled,

"Laclede's Lament - Will the Landing ever get its act together?"


This summer the LLRC managed to green-light two projects, including a new 49-unit condominium complex overlooking the Mississippi River that will begin rising next April. Spearheaded by Clayton developers the Rodgers Brothers, Port of St. Louis, as it's to be called, will be the first housing built on the riverfront since before the Civil War.



The second project will be helmed by Red Brick Realty's Pete Rothschild, who is leading redevelopment plans on the 131-year-old Switzer Building, where 28 condos will be situated above street-level retail outlets.

PostDec 12, 2005#11

Another small mention in the St. Louis Business Journal shows this project moving foward with construction to begin in January 2006.


Pete Rothschild will begin construction in January on a $12 million redevelopment of the five-story former Switzer Licorice Building.

4,489
Super ModeratorSuper Moderator
4,489

PostDec 12, 2005#12

I hope they redo the wall painting -especially considering Switzer Candy is back headquartered in St. Louis. Maybe Switzer could pay for the advertising.

2,005
Life MemberLife Member
2,005

PostMar 08, 2006#13

$850,000 in tax credits have been approved for this project.



Brownfield tax credits to launch $12M redevelopment at Switzer Building

St. Louis Business Journal - 11:59 AM CST Wednesday







The Switzer Building was approved for up to $850,000 in state remediation tax credits that will help launch a $12 million redevelopment of into a mix-use facility, Gov. Matt Blunt announced Tuesday.



Once redeveloped, the building that was constructed in the 1880s for Switzer Candy Co., will house several new businesses and support at least 100 new jobs, according to a release. The site will be rehabilitated into a mixed-use facility including a restaurant, candy shop, ground floor commercial space, residential housing units and a parking facility.



Link to Article

10K
AdministratorAdministrator
10K

PostMar 08, 2006#14

I noticed that there is a candy shop planned for the building - I hope it's run by the Switzers!

108
Junior MemberJunior Member
108

PostMar 09, 2006#15

Arch City wrote:I hope they redo the wall painting -especially considering Switzer Candy is back headquartered in St. Louis. Maybe Switzer could pay for the advertising.
I was just thinking the same thing as I read through the thread.



And put me down as another licorice fanatic that is happy as hell that Switzer's have been back on the shelf the last few months.

2,687
Super ModeratorSuper Moderator
2,687

PostMar 17, 2006#16


6,660
AdministratorAdministrator
6,660

PostMar 17, 2006#17

Well that sure is interesting. I was wondering how they were going to fit 54 condos. Looks like a good mix of styles on the addition, while respecting the original building and it's neighbors.

1,282
AdministratorAdministrator
1,282

PostMar 17, 2006#18

Awesome! Xing where did you find that?

2,331
Super ModeratorSuper Moderator
2,331

PostMar 17, 2006#19

Fantastic! Its about time something is done at this prime location.

10K
AdministratorAdministrator
10K

PostMar 17, 2006#20

A 12-story adjacent high-rise? That's too tall! It will block views of the Old Cathedral and cast shadows on the nearby parking lots!



Somebody call St. Louis Citizens for Responsible Development!!



Seriously though, this looks pretty cool. I'd love to see more infill on the Landing.

1,026
Expert MemberExpert Member
1,026

PostMar 17, 2006#21

yeah .... and it could cast a shadow somewhere .... and think of all the criminal elements it will bring in ...

4,489
Super ModeratorSuper Moderator
4,489

PostMar 17, 2006#22

You guys are hilarious.



Anyway, another awesome project for downtown St. Louis.



Thanks for posting, Xing.

480
Full MemberFull Member
480

PostMar 17, 2006#23

This project is beautiful! I'm amazed by everything going on in the city, especially downtown. It seems something new impresses me everyday. Yesterday it was the Chouteau's Landing renderings, today it's the Switzer building.

145
Junior MemberJunior Member
145

PostMar 17, 2006#24

SoulardD wrote:It seems something new impresses me everyday. Yesterday it was the Chouteau's Landing renderings, today it's the Switzer building.


And before that it was 600 Washington...

and before that it was the Robert's Building...

and before that it was ...



:)

2,430
Life MemberLife Member
2,430

PostMar 17, 2006#25

A great looking tower. Hopfuly this and the Port St. Louis projects will get a move on now that is seems clear that the second casino downtown will not be there to create unsightly views.

Read more posts (151 remaining)