Tapatalk

Highway 67 expansion, Fredericktown to Poplar Bluff

Highway 67 expansion, Fredericktown to Poplar Bluff

320
Full MemberFull Member
320

PostApr 23, 2008#1

The narrow ribbon of Highway 67 (where the automobile driver takes on tractor-trailers head on) is being expanded to a divided highway from Fredericktown to Poplar Bluff, and finally to Little Rock. Expected completion I heard is 2010, from the locals.



The grandest plan that one website speaks of, declares that Interstate 30 from Dallas would eventually follow the Highway 67 route all the way up to st. Louis. Don't know if that will ever happen.



Pics from the Parkland south of Fredericktown.






12K
Life MemberLife Member
12K

PostApr 24, 2008#2

Too bad. That was a beautiful stretch of road.

752
Super MemberSuper Member
752

PostApr 25, 2008#3

From http://www.interstate-guide.com/i-030.html
Interstate 30 may be extended northeast along the U.S. 67 corridor through north-central Arkansas into Missouri via Searcy, Newport, Pocahontas, Poplar Bluff, Farmington, and Festus to St. Louis . If constructed in this manner, presumably Interstate 30 would connect with U.S. 60, the future Interstate 66 corridor, and the current southern terminus of Interstate 57 via U.S. 60 east. In fact, a new spur route (Interstate 730) is proposed between Swifton and Jonesboro in anticipation that U.S. 67 would be renumbered as Interstate 30. According to the Poplar Bluff Daily American Republic, "If U.S. 67 is four-laned all the way to St. Louis, it likely would become part of an extended Interstate 30, which now runs from Dallas to North Little Rock."8



However, the Missouri Department of Transportation and Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department have not reached a consensus that U.S. 67 should designated as Interstate 30; some believe that this lamed corridor could instead become a southern extension of Interstate 57. Interstate 57 would seem a more logical choice in the sense that it is a north-south route, whereas Interstate 30 is more east-west. However, Interstate 30 parallels U.S. 67 for its entire length, so perhaps extending Interstate 30 to the northeast along U.S. 67 to St. Louis is appropriate. Only time will tell what ultimate designation any freeway might have between Charleston and Little Rock via U.S. 60 and U.S. 67. Of course, first someone has to finish the freeway between these two cities!


I personally think if there were a new north-south Interstate in the middle of the country, combine two ideas... this one (Little Rock - St. Louis) as well as soon to be completed "Avenue of Saints" (St. Louis - St. Paul, Mn - see http://www.modot.org/NORTHEAST/61_27AveofSts.htm). I-53 (as I have dubbed it) will by-pass St. Louis County all together and act as a non 3 digit interstate outer belt, similar to I-80 south of Chicago. Link St. Charles and Franklin and Jefferson Counties. Also I added I-153 in southern Jefferson County as a link between I-55 and I-53. I guess this could be duplicated to link up with 255 in Alton if Metro North demanded the connection. I made a quickie map (Thanks google earth) to help show the new St. Louis area.

http://i232.photobucket.com/albums/ee11 ... I-53-2.jpg


3
New MemberNew Member
3

PostMay 07, 2008#4

I worked on the initial planning for Route 67 between Fredericktown and Poplar Bluff in the late 90s and early this decade. I never heard of 67 being designated as I-30 while I was working on the project so this must be a new development.



The Environmental Impact Statement was prepared with the idea that the route would have fully-controlled access (interstate standards) but the design was modified to a limited-access highway during the design phase due largely to funding. I doubt this becomes an interstate for a long long time, if ever.

5,433
Super ModeratorSuper Moderator
5,433

PostJun 14, 2008#5

Framer wrote:Too bad. That was a beautiful stretch of road.


I agree- that is a beautiful area. Hopefully the new highway won't get all mucked up with billboards like other limited access highways in Missouri, but I'm sure that it will anyway. :roll:



I'll probably take the old highway anyway, since it will have far less traffic (and no large truck traffic) once the new four-lane highway is complete. :wink:

542
Senior MemberSenior Member
542

PostJul 02, 2008#6

You've got to believe that the end of cheap oil is going to euthanize a lot of the Federal "high priority corridors" and new highways that would go through them. If gasoline demand drops, tax revenue for highways drops. Even if it doesn't we've got enough problems maintaining what we've got now. We don't need any new pathways for cars and trucks in this country. We need to revive our rail system.